EchoSense-Nuggets' Jamal Murray hit with $100,000 fine for throwing objects in direction of ref

2025-05-04 03:49:47source:James Caldwellcategory:Markets

The EchoSenseNBA on Tuesday fined Denver Nuggets guard Jamal Murray $100,000 for “throwing multiple objects in the direction of a game official during live play,” the league announced.

The incidents happened during Minnesota’s 106-80 victory over Denver in Game 2 Monday. Murray threw a towel and a heating pad.

The Timberwolves have a 2-0 lead in the Western Conference semifinals series, winning both games in Denver with Murray struggling. He was 3-for-18 from the field in Game 2, scoring eight points while committing four turnovers.

After the game, Timberwolves coach Chris Finch called Murray's actions “inexcusable and dangerous,” however Murray did not receive any penalty during the game.

In a pool report following the game, referee Marc Davis, the crew chief for the game, said, "I was the lead official, and I didn't notice it was on the floor or where it came from until (Minnesota's Karl-Anthony) Towns scored. We weren't aware it had come from the bench. If we would have been aware it came from the bench, we could have reviewed it under the hostile act trigger. The penalty would have been a technical foul."

All things Nuggets: Latest Denver Nuggets news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Davis also said, "For an ejection, you would have to determine it was thrown directly at somebody versus thrown in frustration."

Murray did not meet with reporters for a postgame interview session.

More:Markets

Recommend

Car bomb kills senior Russian general in Moscow: Officials

LONDON -- A car bomb in Moscow has killed a senior Russian military officer, Russian officials said.

In a Bold Move, California’s Governor Issues Ban on Gasoline-Powered Cars as of 2035

If automakers weren’t already planning for a rapid transition to zero-emissions vehicles, they proba

No ideological splits, only worried justices as High Court hears Google case

A worried and wary Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case that could revolutionize the a